![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Care & Restoration Contents 1) Arachne - the story of a string-winder
***************
2) Some Thoughts about Glue 3) Our Aims, Reversibilty and Materials
1 - Arachne: the story of a string winder
It's easy enough to say that old-fashioned animal glue is best.
It was good enough for Ruckers, Shudi, Broadwood, and all the
rest, and we know it will last for four hundred years. It is also
easily reversible. However, there was a learned debate
amongst the Fortepiano Group recently, during which it emerged
that there were any number of grades (Bloom?) and that some sources are
apparently much better than others. Also, the exact ratio of glue to water,
the temperature at which the brew is used, and the temperatures of the
wood as well as the atmosphere all matter very much. (with a postscript by Tom Strange) Arachne A
Story by David Hackett My string-winder has always been called Arachne – Google her if you don’t know the story. It all started about twenty-five years ago, when I had just bought my first Broadwood square piano. The piano needed a full set of strings, but I simply couldn’t afford to buy professionally made ones. So I decided to make them, and thus Arachne was created. I had never seen a real string-winder (in fact, I still haven’t) – nor have I any idea where to buy one – so Arachne is purely the result of trial and error: plenty of error. The long piece of oak which forms the bed, and the motor, are original, but other parts of the machine have undergone a number of developments. This is the reason for the numerous battle-scars. This is Arachne in her current form, mounted on an
old saw-horse:
Version 1 was driven from one end. Bad mistake! The first modification was to add the long ‘layshaft’ to provide a drive to the tail as well as the head. This is absolutely necessary, otherwise an unacceptable twist builds up in the core – and the swivel tail-bearing fails anyway. Next joke: the layshaft as originally fitted had five equally-spaced lignum vitae bearings, plus the two ends. The bearings are fine, but not the spacing! The shaft quickly started to resonate at the sixth harmonic, and the whole contraption, workshop included, started to shake itself to pieces. Easy solution: randomise the spacings (see pic. above). A word about speeds: Arachne’s driving force is the pump-motor from an old washing-machine. I think it might run at 2450 rpm, but I’m really not sure. Anyway, it’s much too fast. Right from the start, I geared it down, but not enough: early rides were fast and furious. Noisy, too, because I was using old Meccano straight-cut gears. The current version uses two-stage toothed-belt reductions, which are real luxury. (Incidentally, the cost of these pulleys and belts were the first and only actual money that I have spent on Arachne – everything else was ‘recycled’.) Here’s
the head-gear: first reduction from the motor-shaft to the layshaft, then
(duplicated) reductions to the head ...
And tail...
The chunky wooden blocks are bearings. The next thing to say is that there has to be some way of controlling the motor from both ends (unless your arms are six feet long). Arachne has two switches, the little toggle one at the left to start, and the white plastic one at the left to stop (both recycled). Control by voice or willpower would be nice, but that’s for future updates. Now
let’s make a string: Set the head switch
to ‘off’ and the tail switch to ‘on'. The
core has an eye put on in the usual way, and is fixed to the head-drive with a
screw through the U-shaped coupling:
The tail
of the string is long enough to go through the hollow tail-drive, into which it is clamped
with a screw. Pull it nice and tight.
Now the
clever bit (acknowledgement to Lucy Coad).
Bash a gentle ‘flat’ on the string, where you want the winding to
stop. Allow about three turns round the
wrestpin. i.e. pin-to-pin length plus about 2”.
This is called ‘swaging’, and helps to stop the core coming
unwoggled. Remember where this flat is
(at about 61½” on this example).
Now loop
the cover-wire round the bolt holding the eye, and make a few starting turns by
hand. ![]() Now concentrate. NO interruptions or distractions. Hold the coil of covering wire with your right hand, so that your hand acts as a brake. Switch on. Support the core firmly against your left thumb, and pull quite a strong tension on the coil. Do not allow the string to wander towards you, or to bend. Use the stripes on the bed as a guide to keep the pitch correct and constant (you can make striped guides at diferent angles). Walk along towards the right as the winding proceeds, and take care not to tread on the cat.
When you get to the place where the flat is, close up the coils and switch off. Three hands are best for this, but the left hand can be spared for a quick dash to the switch. Under no circumstances let the cover wire go loose on its reel. (This will put the next string at risk, as the coils will get under each other, and not feed properly). Now hang on to the cover wire on the reel, support the swaged bit with your thumb, and pull hard to break the cover. It will break at the string, and this is the best way of getting it tight.
...And
there’s our string!
Wearing a white cotton glove is not essential, but it looks cool, and keeps sweat off the string. It also makes your thumb last a bit longer. Finally, set the head switch to ‘off’ and the tail switch to ‘on’ ready for the next string. As with many of life’s endeavours, a bit of practice leads to improvement. You will have noticed that Arachne makes strings with a right-hand thread, which seems logical to me. Some original strings are left-handed, though. If you are left handed, it might be easier to make the whole thing the other way round. I’m not claiming that these strings are perfect, but they work for me, and it’s a lot of fun! Also quite a bit cheaper than buying them... Good
luck! David Hackett October 2009 ****************************** A short addendum to the story of
Arachne by David Hackett. I had been content to order the over spun strings from a supplier here in America as I always imagined the set up to make such a string was too capital intensive. But hearing that David made his own led me to ask how he managed it, and his story of the development of Arachne was extremely useful. Being an engineer myself, I could imagine making such a device for a very economical price, compared to the $10/string charge that I was paying. On a Broadwood square of 1793, this amounts to 26 strings and so $260 for the set. Following all of David’s lessons learned, I went a few steps further just to see if I could describe a winder that could be built without relying on specific scrounged parts. Power is obtained from a hand drill motor, mounted on a 2” X 8” X 8’ pine timber as found in any building supply house for under $10.00. A cheap hand drill motor is sufficient as a power source, making sure to get one with a relatively low maximum speed, such as 600-900 RPM. A variable speed is handy for final adjustment.
Just as with Arachne, wood blocks make excellent support and bearing members. Since I was using ¼” drive components, I drilled the blocks out to one size under ¼ inch then finished the hole with a ¼ inch coarse bar stock to heat harden the wood, though you can skip the step in my opinion. A 3/8” relief counter sunk on each side is made, leaving about ¼ inch of the wood to make the bearing, and relieves the bearing surface so that exact placement of the wood block is less important. You only want to support the drive shaft or wire tension shafts with as little binding as possible. A good moly grease used liberally results in very smooth operation. The drive rod was a 6 foot long piece of ¼ “A2 polished steel shaft. It costs only a few dollars more and makes a great drive shaft.
I also stepped down the RPM by choosing the drive pulley sets to give about a 2 to 1 RPM reduction, which allows the drill motor to be used at closer to full output, and results in higher possible torque. The drill can be held at a fixed trigger depth with a tie wrap, or you could provide a cam to hold it at various speeds depending on personal comfort. In general, it seems to work best to wind at the highest speed you can keep up with. There is less time to lose concentration and vary the angle or string position.
Rather than bother to remember to reset switches, I used three way switches from the building supply store such that the machine can be turned on and off from either end independently.
I also provided a good hand rest bar along the winding path that allows close control of the winding.
For making the flat at the tuning pin end, I mounted some scrap A2 steel plate on a wood block that is just the height of the string, and can be slid under and tapped firmly with a ball peen hammer.
Running at about 400 RPM, a string takes around 3 minutes to wind. That seems to be a comfortable speed for me. The pitch of the over spun is controlled by the angle that the string is held and the position of the core string towards or away from you. If the pitch is uniform, your finger will remain in the same position relative to the over spun string paying off the whole way. If it gets ahead or retards, you are varying the pitch of the over spun. The overspun on a 1793 Broadwood varied between 1.3 mm for the lowest FF, to 1.8mm for F. I did try making a guide that would keep the pitch constant as it ran along the hand rest, but really, it seemed better to just concentrate on keeping the angle constant by eye. There is considerable variation in original strings that I suspect was common, as this was a job often given to wives and children of builders to do! The materials for this project are captured below. Not included was a piece of scrap oak I used to make the bearing blocks. I happened to have a cordless drill that was unusable because the batteries are obsolete, and a good DC power supply, so I substituted these for the new drill motor. If you buy the new drill motor, count on picking up an outlet with a third electrical box, a power cord, and cover plate so you can just plug your string winding lath into that.
Thanks
to Tom for this. It's the usual story: we British invent
something, then leave it to the Americans to make it properly! *************************** Some Thoughts about Glue The snag comes when a humble amateur tries to use this glue (or rather one of this family of glues) for himself. If we are lucky, we can buy non-specific 'pearl' glue from a local store, or by mail-order. But have you tried to buy an electric glue-pot lately? By definition, no modern glue can possibly have a pedigree this long, but they were all developed for a purpose. There's also the point that a decent joint with an inferior glue may well be better than a poor job with the best material - and hot glueing is not the easiest trick on the table. So let's look at the options: Hide or Animal Glue. Agreed that this is the best choice for most jobs if you can cope. I used to use an old iron double pot on a camping stove, but recently I have been experimenting with a chocolate fondue pot: easy to clean, and much less dangerous. Heating up can be a bit slow, but I've put in a switch to by-pass the thermostat. On the subject of danger, the old boys used to make a bonfire of shavings inside the body of an instrument before fixing a soundboard, but this sounds too risky even for me. Also, the 'glue-room' was the only warm place in the factory in winter. My barn is colder than this, and even heating it up doesn't really warm the wood through. So I have to wait until summer. And once you start, you have only seconds to make the joint. I have assistants, it's true, but the glue tends to make their paws all sticky, and to get in their fur... Liquid Hide Glue. For example 'Titebond Liquid Hide Glue', sold by Axminster in the UK. This is real hide glue, but with a chemical setting system. It does have a 'best before' date on the neck of the bottle, and it's probably a good idea to keep within this. Obviously much more convenient, especially for small jobs, and seems to work OK. It also has a much longer 'working time' than hot glue. Whether it's as strong or not, I don't know. Any thoughts? But certainly it's reversible with heat and moisture in the proper way. It also seems to stick nicely to ivory keytops, which some glues do not. 'Seccotine' This is a fish-based glue, I believe, and a favourite of bookbinders. There is a myth that cats go crazy for it, but I can say from my own research that five out of five cats are not interested at all. I've just got some (Seccotine, that is). It's certainly very sticky, and seems ideal for leather repairs such as hinges. Any users out there? PVA 'White'. Any number of brands, and I'm not picking on one. Some are more waterproof than others, and none is easily reversible. Difficult to sand, and looks peculiar if visible. Can't really see any advantage over Liquid Hide, and plenty of disadvantages. Aliphatic Resin 'Yellow' These are ones that say things like "Bonds Stronger Than Wood" - which sounds good. Until you go on to read: "Not for structural or load-bearing applications." Oh, so that means it's ideal for.... Also not reversible, and the problem with this and PVA is that they never really harden, and tend to 'creep' when under load. Also, some concerns that if used to glue a bridge, for example, they could have a deadening effect on the tone. Not sure if I can see any point in these either. Polyurethane Ambitious claims are made for these relatively new glues, but do they also 'creep'? They are certainly very difficult to clean up or remove. Mmmm... Urea Formaldehyde Resins I've saved these for last in my 'main' group. I'll state my position straight away, and say that I trust these for main structural work in new instruments. They are not reversible, but when I put the wrestplank in a spinet, I don't see why it should ever come out again. My favourite brand is Aerolite 306. This was developed in the late 1930s, and used for the splendid Mosquito aircraft. Stressed? I think so. It is still very popular for boats and light aircraft. This is a two-part glue; the main part is mixed with water and brushed on to one surface (the more absorbent one) and the formic acid hardener brushed onto the other component. We then have a sensible number of minutes to get the joint right, light clamping for a few hours, and that's it. The main part stays useable for hours - even days if covered. Not as convenient as ready-mix for small jobs, but a fine result. The other group of these are one-part (the old Cascamite, now e.g. Polymite). These have the hardener included, and the whole thing starts working when water is added. sounds more convenient, but the working time of the mix is reduced considerably, as it starts hardening straight away. Let me say it again - these joints are hard and CANNOT be undone - but if the bridge is properly glued to the soundboard, why do you want to remove it? So I back off suggesting Aerolite for antique repairs, but it's my choice for my own new instruments. Now for a few controversial 'cheats': Epoxy Resin - 'Araldite' is the best-known. Two-part, and quite expensive. But these are my own favourite remedy for damaged bridges. If a piano bridge is cracked (very common) worm eaten (not unusual) or has broken bridge pins... the options are a new bridge (big job) or some kind of repair. Animal glue no help here. But those broken-off bridge pins can be dug out. If the bridge is still firmly glued to the soundboard (who says animal glues can't creep?) then cracks can be filled, worm-holes repaired, and new bridge-pins seated in a bed of - Araldite! (Don't let it get on the soundboard - preserve that reversibility criterion). After a couple of hours or so, the Araldite goes like Parmesan cheese, and can be shaped and trimmed with a scalpel. After a day or so, it's there for ever, but can still be filed and drilled In my experience, it is acoustically undetectable. And with possibly a little bit of acrylic paint-work, virtually invisible. All this without upsetting the soundboard. It's worked for me. And the bridge would have been scrap otherwise... Copydex - another book-repairers' favourite, and the only brand of this type I know. A very low-strength adhesive that never really hardens, but is quite handy for sticking cloths to wood - e.g. on Viennese grand key-tails. Yes, I know they used animal glue, but isn't Copydex better? Not reversible - don't get it on your best woolly. Cyanoacrylate - 'Super Glue'. Has anybody had the courage to read this far? Now I wouldn't go so far as to recommend this for antique instruments, but I find it very good for hammer-coverings on new pianos... There is never any glue underneath the striking surface, and the technique (I think) is to anchor one end first, let it set, pull the leather over to the other side, glue again, and clamp to maintain the tension. All of this is possible with animal glue, of course, but things can get a little messy, and we have to wait a day before doing the second bit. But with Superglue, just a dab, fix, hold for 20 seconds, glue the other side, squeeze, and voilà! you have bonded your fingers to the hammer... Come on now, let's have your thoughts! All contributions please to friends.sp@btinternet.com *****************************
3) Our Aims, Reversibilty and MaterialsThe Site offers an opportunity for Amateurs (and Professionals, if they will) to exchange notes, ideas, and problems. In a perfect world, all pianos would be professionally restored to a high standard, but the reality is that there are more pianos about than there are good homes. Perhaps it is more realistic to strive for more modest aims: - to record as much original detail as possible [please see 'Register your piano' on 'Seekers Corner'] especially of 'unrestored' instruments, before any irreversible steps are taken - to identify the best and most important pianos, and to try to ensure that these have a good future - to encourage professional restoration where possible, but to do what we can to ensure that any amateur work is done to a high standard, and at the very least is reversible. The Best and Most Important - which are these? All opinions welcome! If we take auction prices as a guideline, then eighteenth-century five-octave single-action pianos are the best - especially those bearing the name Zumpe (£7000 for a recent sale). Other 'early' names such as Pohlman and Ganer also command a premium, whereas restoration counts for little. Original Condition is the thing. But these pianos were soon regarded as primitive, and improved (as musical instruments) with greater compass, and double actions with escapement. Pianos became heavier, trestle and French stands gave way to turned legs (six at first, then four) and awkward handstops were superseded by pedals. The sound was bigger, but the value (now) is less. The leading auction houses are really not interested in square pianos made after about 1810. Neither is rarity an indicator of value. There are, for example, believed to be at least 50 Zumpe pianos known, and at least 80 by Ganer, but only about three bearing Houston's name. This is not reflected in the price. The strange consequence of all this is that the very important 'developed' square pianos from the Regency to the early years of Victoria's reign, although numerous now, could easily become threatened. There are some lovely pianos from this era - one of my favourites was a Broadwood from 1835, which was delightful to play, and made a sound like a miniature grand. It also was entirely original, made from beautiful mahogany with brass inlay, and worked perfectly. Please don't neglect these later squares - they need Friends as well! A Note about Reversibility Some of us get a bit sniffy about 'unsympathetic' restorations using chrome wrestpins and scarlet felt, but at least these can usually be replaced with something nearer to the original. Once we have bought a square piano, it is of course ours to do as we wish, but we don't really want to look back at what we have done in sorrow. Some good guidelines are: - think carefully before doing anything that cannot be undone - use original materials is at all possible - never use modern permanent glues. On the last point, proper hot 'scotch' glue is best, and is what was used originally, but for small repairs 'Titebond' Liquid Hide Glue is quite satisfactory, and very much more convenient. Do make sure it is in good condition though - it goes off, and there should be a 'use by' date on the shoulder of the bottle. Authentic Materials Please see the 'Friends and Suppliers' section for some of our favourite suppliers of strings, brassware, etc. Otherwise, perhaps we could help each other? Please see 'Pianos and Parts' - 'For Sale' and 'Wanted'. Some useful suggestions are: Mahogany: Modern timber is hopeless. Collect useful old timber when you have the chance. Be aware that there were several kinds of mahogany, varying in density and colour. More than one species was used, and I am not going to get into any arguments here! Suffice to say that if you ask three experts, you will get four opinions. Useful sources include old furniture, and even old pianos... not squares, of course... Ivory: Happily unobtainable new, these days. Keep an eye open for old pianos at your local tip, though. If the keys are ivory, it's too late for that particular elephant, but please let's recycle. Be aware that ivory varies in colour, thickness, and grain. Many cheap upright pianos in the nineteenth century used rather thin ivory, but there are ways of coping with this. Whalebone : (More correctly: Baleen) Again, happily now unobtainable. The last supplies are believed to have been used for naval officers' hats, rather than ladies' stays, but the cupboard is now bare. However, I have used carbon fibre for replacement springs on 'Zumpe' actions with some success! Fishing-tackle shops can usually help, but may be puzzled as to why you are offering good money for a broken fishing-rod... Cloth: Felt was never used until the 1830s (?) and then only for hammer coverings. On square pianos, it always looks 'wrong'. For actions, hitchrail facings, etc. we should use woollen cloth of the correct thickness and colour. Keep your eyes open everywhere from John Lewis to jumble sales. If the colour is not right, dyeing is usually no problem - wool is easy to dye, and the result doesn't have to be washed again! ******************
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||